Actual classroom observation practice often differs from best practice, with principal-teacher perception gaps on measures and observer qualifications¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Eighty percent of principals versus 52% of teachers agree the frameworks use validated observation measures, and 93% of principals versus 66% of teachers agree observers are qualified. → Slotnik 2015
Evidence¶
Slotnik 2015¶
Slotnik, W. J., Bugler, D., & Liang, G. (2015). Change in Practice in Maryland: Student Learning Objectives and Teacher and Principal Evaluation. Mid-Atlantic Comprehensive Center (WestEd and Community Training and Assistance Center). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED568386
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Statewide survey of educators from 24 districts (2015). A parallel item found 93% of principals and 66% of teachers agreed observations are conducted by observers/evaluators qualified to do the evaluation. Interviews and focus groups indicate actual observation practice often differs from best practice.
"Eighty percent of principals and 52% of teachers agree that the evaluation frameworks and processes use validated observation measures/instruments."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Principals were far more likely than trained external observers to rate the same instruction Distinguished rather than Proficient — related
- Principals inflated ratings at the high end of the scale, more often identifying instruction as distinguished than observers — related
- In one case-study school, a principal's lack of Framework knowledge and inability to rate practice led teachers to perceive the new evaluation as subjective, undermining buy-in — related
- Principals rated teaching practice reliably at the low and middle ends of the rating scale, and most principals' severity matched trained observers — related
- Developers of the principal practice instruments provided only partial information about the instruments' reliability and validity — related
- Effects of collaborative instruction are mostly the same size whether interventions used trained teachers or assistants without teaching qualifications — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
observation-practice-gaps-principal-teacher |
title |
Actual classroom observation practice often differs from best practice, with principal-teacher perception gaps on measures and observer qualifications |
description |
Actual classroom observation practice often differs from best practice, with principal-teacher perception gaps on measures and observer qualifications |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — slotnik-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.