Claims

Across 78 observed classrooms, 46% of teacher ratings were at the unsatisfactory or basic level, with AMPS teachers earning generally higher ratings than IDS and Renaissance 2010 teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2012: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Amalgamated ratings from all observations indicate 46% of ratings were at the unsatisfactory or basic level. → Daniel C. Humphrey 2009 q2 i? AMPS teachers earned generally higher ratings than teachers in IDS and Renaissance 2010 schools, with more proficient and distinguished practice observed in AMPS classrooms. → Daniel C. Humphrey 2009 (2)

Evidence

Daniel C. Humphrey 2009

Daniel C. Humphrey, Patrick M. Shields. (2009). High School Reform in Chicago Public Schools: An Overview. SRI International / Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=High+School+Reform+in+Chicago+Public+Schools+An+Overview

q2 · i? · design · r2

Exploratory classroom observation study of 78 teachers using a modified Danielson Framework, each observation lasting one class period. Ratings were distributed as: Unsatisfactory 10%, Basic 36%, Proficient 49%, Distinguished 5% (Exhibit 5); no effect size was printed.

"Amalgamated ratings from all of the observations indicate that 46% of the ratings were at the unsatisfactory or basic level."

Daniel C. Humphrey 2009 (2)

Daniel C. Humphrey, Patrick M. Shields. (2009). High School Reform in Chicago Public Schools: An Overview. SRI International / Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=High+School+Reform+in+Chicago+Public+Schools+An+Overview

q2 · i? · design · r2

Cross-initiative comparison of observation ratings (Exhibit 6): AMPS 3% unsatisfactory/22% basic/60% proficient/15% distinguished versus IDS 12%/42%/43%/3% and Renaissance 2010 10%/39%/49%/2%. The authors caution ratings should not lead to conclusions about teacher quality across schools; no effect size was printed.

"However, among the classrooms we observed, we did find more examples of proficient and distinguished instructional practice in AMPS than in IDS and Renaissance 2010 schools (see Exhibit 6)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id observation-ratings-46-percent-basic-unsatisfactory
title Across 78 observed classrooms, 46% of teacher ratings were at the unsatisfactory or basic level, with AMPS teachers earning generally higher ratings than IDS and Renaissance 2010 teachers
description Across 78 observed classrooms, 46% of teacher ratings were at the unsatisfactory or basic level, with AMPS teachers earning generally higher ratings than IDS and Renaissance 2010 teachers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2009
recheck_by 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — daniel-c-humphrey-2009, daniel-c-humphrey-2009-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.