Observational learning devotes a significantly lower percentage of learning activity to elaborative processing than the other three approaches¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Learners in the observational learning environment spent a significantly smaller share of their utterances on elaborative processes than learners in the inquiry, self-explanation-based, and hypermedia environments. → Tessa H. S. Eysink & Ton de Jong 2012
Evidence¶
Tessa H. S. Eysink & Ton de Jong 2012¶
Tessa H. S. Eysink & Ton de Jong (2012). Does Instructional Approach Matter? How Elaboration Plays a Crucial Role in Multimedia Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611776
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Percentage analysis of coded think-aloud utterances from the 40-participant experiment: observational learners' share of elaborative processing was significantly below all three other environments, with the printed Z and p values for each pairwise comparison.
"learners in the observational learning environment devoted significantly fewer of their learning activities to elaborative processes than those in all three other environments (Z = –3.78, p < .001, for inquiry learning; Z = –3.63, p < .001, for self-explanation-based learning; and Z = –2.80, p < .008, for hypermedia learning)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self-explanation-based and inquiry learning elicit more elaborative processes than hypermedia and observational learning, fully for hypothesis testing and integrating and partly for giving explanations — related
- Self-explanation-based and inquiry learning environments elicit significantly more total learning-process instances than hypermedia and observational learning environments — related
- Hypermedia learners show the lowest total engagement in learning processes, devoting most processing to superficial activities — reports the opposite
- The self-explanation-based environment elicits the most (self-)explanations and the inquiry environment elicits high hypothesis generation — related
- Generative instructional conditions (inquiry and explanation) outperformed receptive conditions on far transfer, with inquiry best on far transfer problems — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
observational-learning-lowest-elaborative-percentage |
title |
Observational learning devotes a significantly lower percentage of learning activity to elaborative processing than the other three approaches |
description |
Observational learning devotes a significantly lower percentage of learning activity to elaborative processing than the other three approaches |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tessa-h-s-eysink-ton-de-jong-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.