Claims

Obstacle Course enrichment enhances spatial object location memory in mice, outperforming enriched housing with a shortened sample phase

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-26 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Gattas 2022 (2): the intervention came bundled with another change (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-26)

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 With a 24-h delay, OC and EH groups performed significantly better than the CC group on object location memory. → Gattas 2022 q2 i3 With a 7-min sample and 24-h delay, the OC group significantly outperformed the EH group and was the only group to discriminate the displaced object. → Gattas 2022 (2)

Evidence

Gattas 2022

Gattas, S., Collett, H. A., Huff, A. E., Creighton, S. D., Weber, S. E., Buckhalter, S. S., Manning, S. A., Ryait, H. S., McNaughton, B. L., & Winters, B. D. (2022). A rodent obstacle course procedure controls delivery of enrichment and enhances complex cognitive functions. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00134-x

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

Object location memory experiment in the same four-group design (n = 40), run 5–6 months post-enrichment. Planned t-tests showed the OC group significantly differed from the CC group, t(18) = 4.340, p < 0.001, and EH differed from CC, t(18) = 3.136, p = 0.006, at 24 h.

"a repeated measures ANOVA revealed a signi ficant interaction between the length of delay and group, F(3, 36) = 4.294, p = 0.011, partial η2 = 0.264, and a signi ficant main effect of delay, F(1, 36) = 30.763, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.461;"

Gattas 2022 (2)

Gattas, S., Collett, H. A., Huff, A. E., Creighton, S. D., Weber, S. E., Buckhalter, S. S., Manning, S. A., Ryait, H. S., McNaughton, B. L., & Winters, B. D. (2022). A rodent obstacle course procedure controls delivery of enrichment and enhances complex cognitive functions. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00134-x

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

OLM experiment with a shortened 7-min sample and 24-h delay in the same four-group design. At this suboptimal sample and increased delay, only mice in the OC group, t(9) = 2.585, p = 0.029, discriminated the displaced object.

"an ANOVA showed a signi ficant effect of group, F(3, 36) = 3.623, p = 0.022, partial η2 = 0.232, and independent samples t-tests revealed that the OC group showed an enhancement on task performance compared to the EH group, t(18) = −3.041, p = 0.007"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id oc-enrichment-enhances-object-location-memory
title Obstacle Course enrichment enhances spatial object location memory in mice, outperforming enriched housing with a shortened sample phase
description Obstacle Course enrichment enhances spatial object location memory in mice, outperforming enriched housing with a shortened sample phase
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
source_checked 2026-10-26
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — gattas-2022, gattas-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.