Claims

The effect of offline computer-based digital education on medical doctors' knowledge gain compared with face-to-face learning is uncertain (very low grade evidence)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Compared with face-to-face learning, the effect of OCDE on doctors' knowledge gain is uncertain, with ratio of the means ranging 0.95-1.17 across 8 studies and 495 participants at very low grade of evidence. → Wahabi HA 2019

Evidence

Wahabi HA 2019

Wahabi HA, Esmaeil SA, Bahkali KH, Titi MA, Amer YS, Fayed AA, Jamal A, Zakaria N, Siddiqui AR, Semwal M, Car LT, Posadzki P, Car J. (2019). Medical Doctors' Offline Computer-Assisted Digital Education: Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/12998

q2 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review narrative synthesis of trials comparing OCDE with face-to-face learning on knowledge gain. The review reports an "RM range 0.95-1.17" across 8 studies and 495 participants, graded very low because of high risk of bias, heterogeneity, and indirectness.

"Compared with face-to-face learning, the effect of OCDE on knowledge gain is uncertain (ratio of the means [RM] range 0.95-1.17; 8 studies, 495 participants; very low grade of evidence)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.