Tertiary L1 Malay learners given online corrective feedback via email outperformed the conventional corrective feedback control group on the final draft¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After the different treatments were applied, the experimental group receiving online corrective feedback scored significantly better than the control group receiving conventional corrective feedback on Draft 2 (p = .000). → Yoke et al. 2013
Evidence¶
Yoke et al. 2013¶
Soo Kum Yoke, Cecilia Bai Rajendran, Noridah Sain, Puteri Nur Hidayah Kamaludin, Sofwah Md Nawi & Suhaili Mohd Yusof. (2013). The Use of Online Corrective Feedback in Academic Writing by L1 Malay Learners. English Language Teaching, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n12p175
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Paired sample t-test on draft scores from the experimental study of 44 L1 Malay students in two academic writing classes, 22 per group. The article reports the Draft 2 comparison as significant, "p value is .000 (p<.05)"; no effect size is printed.
"For pair 2 (Draft 2 between the control and experimental groups), the p value is .000 (p<.05). This means that there is a significant difference after the different treatments were applied to the groups."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Online corrective feedback produced larger reductions in sentence structure, grammar and vocabulary errors than conventional corrective feedback, which showed no grammar improvement — related
- Most students preferred receiving corrective feedback online via email, with ease of submission and time saving the leading reasons — related
- The control and experimental groups showed no significant difference in writing performance on the first draft — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.