Claims

The OCR program shows a positive differential impact for Kindergarten students relative to other grades

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Subgroup analyses found positive differential impacts of the OCR program by grade level (Kindergarten), with a Treatment x Low Grade interaction of 2.56 (SE 0.79, p < .01). → Vaden-Kiernan 2016

Evidence

Vaden-Kiernan 2016

Vaden-Kiernan, M., Borman, G., Caverly, S., Bell, N., Ruiz de Castilla, V., Sullivan, K., & Fleming, G. (2016). Findings from a Multi-Year Scale-Up Effectiveness Trial of Open-Court Reading (Imagine It!). SREE Spring 2016 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567512

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory subgroup (moderator) analysis within the Year 1 multilevel ITT model. Table 3 prints a Treatment x Low Grade interaction estimate of 2.56 (SE 0.79, **), described as a positive differential impact for Kindergarten students; no standardized effect size is printed for this interaction.

"However, subgroup analyses did find positive differential impacts of the OCR program by grade level (Kindergarten) and student ethnicity (Hispanic)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.