Claims

Satisfaction motivation did not differ significantly between OER blended learning and face-to-face classroom learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Although the treatment group's satisfaction mean (29.74) was descriptively higher than the control group's (28.70), the difference was not statistically significant (F = 3.776, Sig. .057). → Sulisworo 2017

Evidence

Sulisworo 2017

Sulisworo, D., Sulistiyo, E. N., & Akhsan, R. N. (2017). The motivation impact of open educational resources utilization on physics learning using Quipper School app. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 18(4), Article 9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1161803

q2 · i? · causal · r1

One-way ANOVA on the satisfaction factor in the same quasi-experiment; Table 3 prints F = 3.776, Sig. .057, above the 5% alpha. The study did not detect a significant difference; equivalence was not tested and no effect size is printed.

"Although Table 2 shows that the average score for this aspect was higher for the treatment group (29.74) than the control group (28.70), but this difference is not significant (see table 3)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.