Claims

Students using OER save significant amounts of money compared to purchasing commercial textbooks.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review reports that students generally achieve the same learning outcomes when OER are utilized and simultaneously save significant amounts of money. → Hilton 2016

Evidence

Hilton 2016

Hilton, J., III. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's synthesis statement that "students generally achieve the same learning outcomes when OER are utilized and simultaneously save significant amounts of money".

"Results across multiple studies indicate that students generally achieve the same learning outcomes when OER are utilized and simultaneously save significant amounts of money."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id oer-significant-cost-savings-students
title Students using OER save significant amounts of money compared to purchasing commercial textbooks.
description Students using OER save significant amounts of money compared to purchasing commercial textbooks.
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hilton-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.