Open-ended tasks produce higher AI literacy performance than structured tasks¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Participants completing open-ended tasks outperformed those completing structured tasks (ηp2 = 0.091). → Yu S 2026

Evidence¶

Yu S 2026¶

Yu S, Lin Y and Chen C (2026) Designing for AI literacy: psychological mechanisms and self-determination. Front. Psychol. 17:1937845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1937845

q3 · i2 · causal · r3

Two-way ANOVA main effect of task type in the same randomized 2×2 experiment: F(1, 316) = 31.45, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.091; OET (M = 9.05) outperformed STT (M = 7.85).

"A significant main effect of task type was also observed, F(1, 316) = 31.45, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.091. Participants completing OET (M = 9.05, SD = 1.97) outperformed those completing STT (M = 7.85, SD = 2.18)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AI literacy interventions show a large, statistically significant overall positive effect on student AI literacy outcomes (g = 0.837) — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it

• Minimal guidance is less effective for novices than explicit instruction — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it

• The TBI advantage over SBI is larger under open-ended tasks than under structured tasks — related
• Instructional approach operates indirectly through autonomy and competence, while task type operates primarily through autonomy — related
• People expecting a reward for a task perform worse than those expecting nothing, especially on tasks requiring cognitive sophistication and open-ended thinking — related