Claims

The omnibus and reading tests correlate .34, indicating they measure partly the same and partly different functions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 1918 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The correlation between weighted time in association and quality of reading is .34, indicating the two tests measure in part the same functions and in part different things. → Haggerty 1918

Evidence

Haggerty 1918

Haggerty, M. E. (1918). Tests of applicants for admission to University of Minnesota Medical School. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(5), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071405

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Correlation between the two admission tests among the 93 tested applicants, reported in Table I. The article states the correlation of ".34 (weighted time in association and quality of reading" shows the tests measure in part the same functions.

"That the two tests measure in part the same functions is indicated by the correlation between them of .34 (weighted time in association and quality of reading. (See Table I)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id omnibus-reading-correlation-34
title The omnibus and reading tests correlate .34, indicating they measure partly the same and partly different functions
description The omnibus and reading tests correlate .34, indicating they measure partly the same and partly different functions
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1918
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — haggerty-1918

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.