Claims

Guaranteed one-on-one counseling with nudging increases academic plan completion by about 23 percentage points over control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students assigned to the one-on-one counseling group with nudging and guaranteed access completed academic plans at a significantly higher rate than control students (42.0% vs 18.8%, a 23.2 percentage point difference, significant at p < .001). → Visher 2016

Evidence

Visher 2016

Visher, M. G., Mayer, A. K., Johns, M., Rudd, T., Levine, A., and Rauner, M. (2016). Scaling academic planning in community college: A randomized controlled trial (REL 2017–204). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Same RCT analytic sample (1,085 workshop, 193 one-on-one, 485 control). Table 2 prints one-on-one completion at 42.0 percent versus 18.8 percent for control, a 23.2*** percentage point difference; the quote states the significant direction and the description adds the printed table values.

"Students who were assigned to either intervention group and who received nudging and a guaranteed counseling appointment were significantly more likely to complete an academic plan than were students in the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.