Claims

All eleven participating first graders gained sight vocabulary, with 89% knowing four or all five taught words at posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? No student knew any of the five target words on the pretest, but all students knew at least three words on the posttest, and 89% of both groups combined knew four or all five. → Sherman 2011

Evidence

Sherman 2011

Sherman, J. (2011). Signing for Success: Using American Sign Language to Learn Sight Vocabulary. SRATE Journal, 20(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ959527

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-and-posttest tabulation of the eleven-student inquiry project: pretest scores were zero for every student, and the article reports "89% of the students knew four or all five of the taught sight words" for both groups combined. Descriptive percentages only; no test statistics are printed.

"Posttest scores indicated growth in sight word acquisition as all students knew at least three or more sight vocabulary words on the posttest."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.