Online (versus offline) measures of metacognition are associated with larger metacognition–math effect sizes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q4
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i? Studies measuring metacognition with online (versus offline) measures showed larger pooled effect sizes for the metacognition–math association. → Gemma Muncer 2021
Evidence¶
Gemma Muncer 2021¶
Gemma Muncer, Philip A. Higham, Corentin J. Gosling, Samuele Cortese, Henry Wood-Downie, & Julie A. Hadwin. (2021). A Meta-Analysis Investigating the Association Between Metacognition and Math Performance in Adolescence. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09620-x
q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
The meta-analysis's moderation analysis compared pooled effect sizes for online versus offline metacognition measures (categorised per Veenman and van Cleef 2019, with four alternative classifications tested) and found online measures "was associated with larger effect sizes". No subgroup effect size is printed in the available text.
"Consideration of online (versus offline) measures of metacognition and more complex (versus simple) measures of math performance, and their combination, was associated with larger effect sizes; however, heterogeneity remained high for all analyses."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The choice of online versus offline measures of SRL moderates the strength of the relationship between SRL processes and achievement — a broader claim this one bears on
- Heterogeneity between studies of the metacognition–math association is significant and remains high in all moderator analyses — related
- Metacognitive measures show large variability, and online measures relate to each other more than to offline measures — related
- The combination of online metacognition measures with complex math assessments is associated with the largest effect sizes — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
online-mc-measures-larger-effects |
title |
Online (versus offline) measures of metacognition are associated with larger metacognition–math effect sizes |
description |
Online (versus offline) measures of metacognition are associated with larger metacognition–math effect sizes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gemma-muncer-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.