Moving oral assessments online reduced required support staff hours from almost 8 days to 3 days¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Moving oral assessments for 742 students from on campus to an online format reduced required support staff hours from almost 8 days to 3 days by eliminating candidate check-in, workspace allocation, and invigilation. → Fenton 2025
Evidence¶
Fenton 2025¶
Fenton, A. (2025). Reconsidering the Use of Oral Exams and Assessments: An Old Way to Move Into a New Future. Educational Researcher, 54(7), 430-436. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X251333638
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports, citing Starr-Egger (2023), an operational analysis of online versus on-campus oral assessment logistics for 742 students. Support staff hours fell from almost 8 days to 3 days; the review attributes the finding to the cited study.
"previous research demonstrated moving oral assessments for 742 students from on campus to an online format reduced the required support staff hours from almost 8 days to 3 days by eliminating the need for candidate check-in, workspace allocation, and invigilation (Starr-Egger, 2023)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Staff time for the Capstone was limited and unequally divided across CHARM-EU partners, with University of Pretoria staff receiving no hours or funding — related
- No evidence found that particular student groups are disadvantaged in oral versus written assessments
- Oral assessments are recommended as a strategy to maintain academic integrity against AI use
- Oral assessments can induce more anxiety than written ones, yet many students still prefer them
- Preparing for oral assessments changes student study habits toward understanding over memorization
- Students performed better on oral measures than written measures in comparison studies
- Students taking online and proctored online exams report higher test anxiety than students taking on-campus exams and non-proctored online exams — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
online-oral-assessments-reduced-staff-hours |
title |
Moving oral assessments online reduced required support staff hours from almost 8 days to 3 days |
description |
Moving oral assessments online reduced required support staff hours from almost 8 days to 3 days |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — fenton-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.