Most serious game evaluation studies do not report the questions of their evaluation instruments; only 38% provide them¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Only 38% of primary studies provided the questions used in their evaluation methods. → Calderón 2015

Evidence¶

Calderón 2015¶

Calderón, A., & Ruiz, M. (2015). A systematic literature review on serious games evaluation: An application to software project management. Computers & Education, 87, 396-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.011

q3 · i? · review · r3

Extended analysis of questionnaire-based evaluation methods in the review. The review notes "Only 38% of the primary studies provided the questions used to collect the information to assess the serious game," most using both quantitative and qualitative questions.

"Only 38% of the primary studies provided the questions used to collect the information to assess the serious game."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Most primary studies lack information about the models supporting their evaluation methods; nearly 50% did not provide enough information about them — related
• Questionnaires are the dominant serious game evaluation technique, used by 90% of primary studies, followed by interviews at about 20% — related