Claims

Only eight of 43 theory-informed IPP education initiatives used an EL-specific theory or model (KELT or the Leicester Model)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of 43 articles explicitly using a theory, framework, or model, eight used one specific to EL: two based on KELT and six based on the Leicester Model. → Nagel Daniel A. 2024

Evidence

Nagel Daniel A. 2024

Nagel Daniel A., Penner Jamie L., Halas Gayle, Philip Mark T., Cooke Carol A. (2024). Exploring experiential learning within interprofessional practice education initiatives for pre-licensure healthcare students: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05114-w

q3 · i? · review · r2

Synthesis of theory use across the 100 included articles in the scoping review. The review reports that 43 articles explicitly used a theory, framework, or model, of which eight used an EL-specific framework, split between KELT and the Leicester Model.

"Eight articles used a theoretical framework and/or model for EL; two were based specifically on KELT [57, 146] and six were based on the Leicester Model that used Kolb's work as a foundation [48, 61, 65, 100, 129, 131]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.