Claims

Document analysis of teaching artefacts validated 25 of the 28 themes and identified 65 instances, supporting the trustworthiness of the interview findings

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The document analysis validated the existence of 25 of the 28 themes and identified 65 instances in total. → Tim Coughlan 2020

Evidence

Tim Coughlan 2020

Tim Coughlan. (2020). The use of open data as a material for learning. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09706-y

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Triangulation step of the qualitative study: fifteen artefacts related to the interviewees' practice were coded against the interview themes. The analysis "validated the existence of 25 of the 28 themes", with 65 instances; three themes were absent for reasons the article attributes to the nature of the documents.

"The document analysis validated the existence of 25 of the 28 themes"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id open-data-document-analysis-validation
title Document analysis of teaching artefacts validated 25 of the 28 themes and identified 65 instances, supporting the trustworthiness of the interview findings
description Document analysis of teaching artefacts validated 25 of the 28 themes and identified 65 instances, supporting the trustworthiness of the interview findings
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tim-coughlan-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.