Open-ended responses on representational visuals differed by group, with treatment teachers more likely to see both pros and cons¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The distribution of coded open-ended responses about whether context pictures help students differed between control and treatment teachers, χ2(2, N = 38) = 10.47, p < .01. → Clinton 2015
q2 i? 45% of treatment teachers expressed both pros and cons of representational visuals versus 17% of control teachers, while 72% of control teachers viewed them as uniformly helpful versus 20% of treatment teachers. → Clinton 2015
Evidence¶
Clinton 2015¶
Clinton, V. & Cooper, J.L. (2015, April). Teacher Viewpoints of Instructional Design Principles for Visuals in a Middle School Math Curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574965
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Open-ended survey question coded into yes, maybe/depends, and no categories for control and treatment teachers. The article prints χ2(2, N = 38) = 10.47, p < .01 and the cited percentages; no effect size reported.
"the distribution of teacher responses across categories differed for control and treatment teachers, χ2(2, N = 38) = 10.47, p < .01). Among the treatment teachers, 45% expressed both pros and cons of visuals in their responses (compared to only 17% of control teachers)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both control and treatment teachers believed labeling benefits learning, disagreed that color coding made lessons too easy, and believed pictures help ELL students — related
- Treatment teachers generally liked the revisions to CMP2 visuals, especially increased color coding and labeling, and liked the revisions at least as much as control teachers liked the originals — related
- Treatment teachers viewed math-irrelevant visuals less favorably than control teachers, suggesting use of the revised curriculum and PD shifted views — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.