No learning curve inflection point was identified for open LLND¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? No inflection point or distinct phases of the learning curve were identified in the open surgery cohort for LLND. → Kehagias D. 2025
Evidence¶
Kehagias D. 2025¶
Kehagias D., Baldari L., Cassinotti E., Boni L., Lampropoulos C., Kehagias I. (2025). Learning curve for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer – a systematic review of literature. Techniques in Coloproctology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03214-3
q2 · i? · review · r2
In the same retrospective study of 120 patients, the open approach (56 patients) showed no identifiable learning curve, which the authors attributed to
"Conversely, no inflection point or distinct phases of the learning curve were identified in the open surgery cohort."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Laparoscopic LLND competence is achieved after 19 cases — related
- Surgical competence in robotic LLND is achieved after 12–53 cases regardless of learning outcome — related
- Blood loss, urinary complications, and morbidity decreased during the proficiency phase of robotic LLND — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.