The Opener produced no difference on pre/post test scores across the whole project¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? There was no statistically significant difference on pre/post tests between students who had an Opener and those who did not. → Zertuche 2012

Evidence¶

Zertuche 2012¶

Zertuche, A., Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2012). How do Openers Contribute to Student Learning? International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(1), 79-92. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070484

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Pre/post tests administered before and 1-14 days after the week-long WISE project, scored with KI rubrics. The article reports no significant difference; equivalence was not tested.

"there was no difference on the pre/post tests between students who had an Opener ( M = 1.74, SD = 2.50) and those who did not ( M = 1.55, SD = 2.16), t(255) = -.511, p = .61."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• For the sample as a whole, elaborative feedback and knowledge of response feedback showed no significant difference in enhancing online L2 reading comprehension — related
• AI multimodal feedback produces post-test learning gains equivalent to educator feedback after controlling for pre-test performance — related
• Intervention and control groups did not differ significantly in attitudes towards statistics at pre-test — related
• Openers particularly benefited students who began with partial (level 3) understanding, while level 2 students made only modest gains — related