Component frequencies: elaboration, other transactivity and expert authority are frequent; multiple justification, personal positioning and questioning are rare¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Openness was frequently observed in elaboration (92.4%), other transactivity (91.8%) and expert authority (77.3%), and infrequently observed in questioning of the knowledge claim (16.8%), personal positioning (16.2%) and multiple justification (6.9%). → van Heijst 2019
Evidence¶
van Heijst 2019¶
van Heijst, H., de Jong, F. P. C. M., van Aalst, J., de Hoog, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Socio-cognitive openness in online knowledge building discourse: does openness keep conversations going? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09303-4
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Frequency analysis (Fig. 4) of proportions of the 594 analyzed notes showing openness per component. The article reports that "Frequently observed openness was found in elaboration (92.4%), other transactivity (91.8%) and expert authority (77.3%)" while openness was not frequently observed in questioning of the knowledge claim (16.8%), personal positioning (16.2%) and multiple justification (6.9%).
"Frequently observed openness was found in elaboration (92.4%), other transactivity (91.8%) and expert authority (77.3%). More evenly divided scores were observed in joint ownership (51.5%) and relativist stance (44.1%)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In Knowledge Forum discourse, three components (connecting knowledge, transactivity, authority) dominated notes, and cognitive openness components predicted follow-up while social openness components predicted slightly reduced follow-up
- Contributions to online knowledge building discourse show moderate socio-cognitive openness, with higher social than cognitive openness
- Social openness components transactivity and authority are associated with less follow-up, and dimension-level openness shows no significant association with follow-up
- Student blogging supports transactive building and emergent common knowledge in a persistent community blogosphere — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
openness-component-frequency-pattern |
title |
Component frequencies: elaboration, other transactivity and expert authority are frequent; multiple justification, personal positioning and questioning are rare |
description |
Component frequencies: elaboration, other transactivity and expert authority are frequent; multiple justification, personal positioning and questioning are rare |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — van-heijst-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.