Claims

OpenSciEd materials equitably support student participation and engagement across racial, gender, and linguistic groups, per field-test SEET and teacher-report data

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-17 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students from different race, gender, and linguistic backgrounds report contributing to class discussions at high levels and say their ideas influence the class. → seet-participation q2 i? Teachers reported the units were accessible to struggling readers, students with IEPs, and multilingual learners. → teacher-accessibility

Evidence

seet-participation

McElhaney, K. W., Mills, K., Kamdar, D., Baker, A., & Roschelle, J. (2023, March). A summary and synthesis of initial OpenSciEd research: Updated version [White paper]. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/171

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports field-test SEET survey analyses from the 2018-2019 OpenSciEd study, finding "students from different race, gender, and linguistic backgrounds report they contribute to class discussions at high levels"; no effect sizes are printed.

"Students from different race, gender, and linguistic backgrounds report they contribute to class discussions at high levels and say their ideas influence the class and help others (OpenSciEd, 2019)."

teacher-accessibility

McElhaney, K. W., Mills, K., Kamdar, D., Baker, A., & Roschelle, J. (2023, March). A summary and synthesis of initial OpenSciEd research: Updated version [White paper]. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/171

q2 · i? · review · r2

Teacher self-report survey data from the 2018-2019 field test, summarized by the review; these are descriptive percentages of teacher perceptions, not direct measures of student engagement.

"84% of teachers said that they were accessible to struggling readers, 76% of teachers said they were accessible to students with Individual Education Plans, and 68% of teachers said they were accessible to multilingual learners (OpenSciEd, 2019)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id openscied-equitable-participation-engagement
title OpenSciEd materials equitably support student participation and engagement across racial, gender, and linguistic groups, per field-test SEET and teacher-report data
description OpenSciEd materials equitably support student participation and engagement across racial, gender, and linguistic groups, per field-test SEET and teacher-report data
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-17
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — seet-participation, teacher-accessibility

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.