Claims

OpenSciEd practitioners' highest-priority needs group into six areas: student engagement, classroom culture, assessment, materials adaptation, planning/reflection time, and teacher capacity.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Survey respondents grouped their highest-priority OpenSciEd challenges into six areas of support, and nearly all of these were also among the challenges reported as occurring most often. → McElhaney 2024

Evidence

McElhaney 2024

McElhaney, K., Urban, R., Kamdar, D., Baker, A., Tsai, K., and Roschelle, J. (2024). Practitioner-reported Needs for Enacting, Implementing, and Adopting OpenSciEd Curriculum Materials [White paper]. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/215

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Survey analysis of 155 practitioners who rated 22 challenges and selected three high-priority ones. The report states that "All these challenges identified as highest priority except for one (adapting materials) were also among the seven challenges respondents reported as experiencing or observing most often."

"All these challenges identified as highest priority except for one (adapting materials) were also among the seven challenges respondents reported as experiencing or observing most often."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id openscied-six-high-priority-need-areas
title OpenSciEd practitioners' highest-priority needs group into six areas: student engagement, classroom culture, assessment, materials adaptation, planning/reflection time, and teacher capacity.
description OpenSciEd practitioners' highest-priority needs group into six areas: student engagement, classroom culture, assessment, materials adaptation, planning/reflection time, and teacher capacity.
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mcelhaney-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.