Claims

Opting out can improve thinking efficiency by cutting wasted effort on doomed attempts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Initial signs from problem-solving contexts indicate that allowing opting out reduces wasted effort on attempts likely to fail. → Yael Sidi · Rakefet Ackerman 2024

Evidence

Yael Sidi · Rakefet Ackerman 2024

Yael Sidi · Rakefet Ackerman. (2024). Opting Out as an Untapped Resource in Instructional Design: Review and Implications. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09879-w

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Ackerman (2014), that in problem-solving contexts "allowing opting out cuts down wasted effort on attempts doomed to fail". The review characterizes this evidence as initial signs only.

"Indeed, beyond the improvement in the quality of the provided information, initial signs from problem-solving contexts indicate that allowing opting out cuts down wasted effort on attempts doomed to fail (Ackerman, 2014)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id opting-out-improves-thinking-efficiency
title Opting out can improve thinking efficiency by cutting wasted effort on doomed attempts
description Opting out can improve thinking efficiency by cutting wasted effort on doomed attempts
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yael-sidi-rakefet-ackerman-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.