Claims

Experimental group outperformed control group on the term test of every one of the five experiments, each difference statistically significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Independent t-tests on each experiment's FGTT were significant (t = -3.41, -4.29, -4.32, -4.54, -3.99; all p < .05), favoring the experimental group. → Akkuzu 2016

Evidence

Akkuzu 2016

Akkuzu, N. & Uyulgan, M.A. (2016). How to Improve Students' Comprehension concerning the Major Terms of Functional Groups?--In the Experiment of OrCheTaboo Game. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p196

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Posttest mean-score comparisons per experiment (alcohols-ethers, aldehydes-ketones, carboxylic acids-esters, maleic-fumaric synthesis, iodoform synthesis) between control (N=30) and experimental (N=32) groups. Mean increase differences ranged from 15.51 to 24.33 in favor of the experimental group; no effect sizes are printed for these tests.

"As a result of the independent t-tests applied to find out if these increases are statistically significant or not, they have been found out to be significant (respectively, t= -3.41, p(.01)<.05; t= -4.29, p(.00)<.05; t= -4.32, p(.00)<.05; t= -4.54, p(.00)<.05; t=-3.99, p(.00)<.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.