The training effect is somewhat weaker for tasks presented at the end of the one-hour battery, suggesting a fatigue effect¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Initial responses rose more for the first task presented than the last task in the training group, though the training benefit over control remained clear even for the last task. → Nina Franiatte 2024

Evidence¶

Nina Franiatte 2024¶

Nina Franiatte, Esther Boissin, Alexandra Delmas, Wim De Neys. (2024). Boosting Debiasing: Impact of Repeated Training on Reasoning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101845

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory order analysis with randomized task order: final responses increased by 51.1 points for the first task and 37.3 for the last; the article attributes the smaller late-battery gain to possible fatigue near the end of the one-hour session.

"In the training group, from pre - to post-intervention, initial responses rose by 50.2 points for the first task and 34.6 points for the last task."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A single debiasing training session significantly increases both intuitive and deliberate accuracy on classic reasoning tasks compared to control — related