Claims

Condition order did not affect working-memory performance but affected the magnitude of reaction-time deterioration when tasks were difficult

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Order had no significant effect on working-memory performance in either the difficult (β = -0.17; p = .319) or the easy part (β = -0.24; p = .163). → Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022 q2 i? Order was significant for RT deterioration in the difficult part (β = 0.40; p = .020) but not in the easy part (β = -0.19; p = .277). → Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022 (2)

Evidence

Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022

Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials. (2022). https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Test+Boredom+While+Working+on+Difficult+Versus+Easy+Tasks%22

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Supplemental Material S8 reports additional linear models testing whether the order of the difficult and easy conditions influenced results. For working-memory performance, order was not significant in either condition, with β = -0.17 (p = .319) in the difficult part and β = -0.24 (p = .163) in the easy part.

"Order had no significant effect on working-memory performance in either the difficult (β = -0.17; p = .319) or the easy part (β = -0.24; p = .163)."

Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022 (2)

Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials. (2022). https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Test+Boredom+While+Working+on+Difficult+Versus+Easy+Tasks%22

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The same additional linear models in Supplemental Material S8 show that for RT deterioration, order was significant in the difficult part (β = 0.40; p = .020) but not in the easy part (β = -0.19; p = .277), "indicating that the sequence of conditions affected the magnitude of RT deterioration when tasks were difficult."

"For RT deterioration, order was significant in the difficult part (β = 0.40; p = .020) but was not significant in the easy part (β = -0.19; p = .277), indicating that the sequence of conditions affected the magnitude of RT deterioration when tasks were difficult."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id order-effects-rt-deterioration-difficult-tasks
title Condition order did not affect working-memory performance but affected the magnitude of reaction-time deterioration when tasks were difficult
description Condition order did not affect working-memory performance but affected the magnitude of reaction-time deterioration when tasks were difficult
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — test-boredom-while-working-on-difficult-versus-easy-tasks-online-supplementary-materials-2022, test-boredom-while-working-on-difficult-versus-easy-tasks-online-supplementary-materials-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.