Condition order did not affect working-memory performance but affected the magnitude of reaction-time deterioration when tasks were difficult¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Order had no significant effect on working-memory performance in either the difficult (β = -0.17; p = .319) or the easy part (β = -0.24; p = .163). → Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022
q2 i? Order was significant for RT deterioration in the difficult part (β = 0.40; p = .020) but not in the easy part (β = -0.19; p = .277). → Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022¶
Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials. (2022). https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Test+Boredom+While+Working+on+Difficult+Versus+Easy+Tasks%22
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Supplemental Material S8 reports additional linear models testing whether the order of the difficult and easy conditions influenced results. For working-memory performance, order was not significant in either condition, with β = -0.17 (p = .319) in the difficult part and β = -0.24 (p = .163) in the easy part.
"Order had no significant effect on working-memory performance in either the difficult (β = -0.17; p = .319) or the easy part (β = -0.24; p = .163)."
Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022 (2)¶
Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials. (2022). https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Test+Boredom+While+Working+on+Difficult+Versus+Easy+Tasks%22
q2 · i? · causal · r2
The same additional linear models in Supplemental Material S8 show that for RT deterioration, order was significant in the difficult part (β = 0.40; p = .020) but not in the easy part (β = -0.19; p = .277), "indicating that the sequence of conditions affected the magnitude of RT deterioration when tasks were difficult."
"For RT deterioration, order was significant in the difficult part (β = 0.40; p = .020) but was not significant in the easy part (β = -0.19; p = .277), indicating that the sequence of conditions affected the magnitude of RT deterioration when tasks were difficult."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The experience of disgust per se does not affect the trajectory of working memory performance in either young or older adults — related
- Point values and point order altered item selection and recall: Easy First order produced higher recall, and points increased goal pursuit but appeared to hurt recall — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
order-effects-rt-deterioration-difficult-tasks |
title |
Condition order did not affect working-memory performance but affected the magnitude of reaction-time deterioration when tasks were difficult |
description |
Condition order did not affect working-memory performance but affected the magnitude of reaction-time deterioration when tasks were difficult |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — test-boredom-while-working-on-difficult-versus-easy-tasks-online-supplementary-materials-2022, test-boredom-while-working-on-difficult-versus-easy-tasks-online-supplementary-materials-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.