Organizational support positively predicts both AI literacy and technological self-efficacy among university faculty¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Organizational support significantly and positively predicts AI literacy (β = 0.217, p < 0.001). → Liu 2026 q2 i? Organizational support significantly and positively predicts technological self-efficacy (β = 0.281, p < 0.001). → Liu 2026

Evidence¶

Liu 2026¶

Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Yan, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H. (2026). Exploring University Faculty’s AI Well-Being: A Structural Equation Model of Social Supports, AI Literacy, and Technological Self-Efficacy. Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16071168

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Same SEM of the 502-faculty cross-sectional survey, Results §4.2. The authors state that "organizational support positively predicted both AI literacy" and technological self-efficacy with the printed standardized coefficients, attributing this to institutional infrastructure, policy incentives, and strategic alignment.

"organizational support positively predicted both AI literacy (β = 0.217, p < 0.001) and technological self-efficacy (β = 0.281, p < 0.001)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AI literacy is the strongest predictor of faculty AI well-being in the structural model — related
• Social and organizational support relate to AI well-being indirectly through AI literacy and technological self-efficacy — a broader claim this one bears on
• Perceived social support positively predicts both AI literacy and technological self-efficacy among university faculty — related
• Technological self-efficacy significantly but modestly predicts faculty AI well-being — related