Claims

Outdoor learning in nature reduces student stress (cortisol decline), but stress-restoration findings are mixed by measure and age

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students in outdoor forest learning showed significantly greater cortisol decline across the school day than controls, but heart rate and blood pressure showed no significant greenspace effect in adolescents. → Vi Ly · Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick 2024

Evidence

Vi Ly · Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick 2024

Vi Ly · Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick. (2024). Effects of School-led Greenspace Interventions on Mental, Physical and Social Wellbeing in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09963-1

q3 · i? · review · r3

The review reports Dettweiler et al.'s quasi-experimental study found "a significant decline in stress for 37 primary school students engaged in outdoor learning in a forest" versus 11 controls, using salivary cortisol. No effect size is printed.

"Dettweiler et al. (2017) found a significant decline in stress for 37 primary school students engaged in outdoor learning in a forest, compared to 11 students in traditional indoor classrooms, measured using salivary cortisol."

Vi Ly · Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick 2024 (2)

Vi Ly · Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick. (2024). Effects of School-led Greenspace Interventions on Mental, Physical and Social Wellbeing in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09963-1

q3 · i? · review · r3

The review reports a null result from Greenwood and Gatersleben's RCT with 120 secondary students: "a non-significant difference between relaxing in the school greenspace and an indoor room" on stress restoration measured by heart rate and blood pressure.

"Greenwood and Gatersleben (2016) found a non-significant difference between relaxing in the school greenspace and an indoor room, on secondary-school students' stress restoration, as measured by heart rate and blood pressure levels."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id outdoor-learning-reduces-student-stress-cortisol
title Outdoor learning in nature reduces student stress (cortisol decline), but stress-restoration findings are mixed by measure and age
description Outdoor learning in nature reduces student stress (cortisol decline), but stress-restoration findings are mixed by measure and age
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2024
source_checked 2026-10-21
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — vi-ly-dianne-a-vella-brodrick-2024, vi-ly-dianne-a-vella-brodrick-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.