Claims

Increased physical activity does not negatively affect academic performance, but academic performance is not caused solely by increased physical activity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The analysis shows physical activity itself does not negatively affect academic performance, and changes in academic performance are not caused solely by increases in the frequency and/or duration of physical activity. → Sember Vedrana 2020

Evidence

Sember Vedrana 2020

Sember Vedrana, Jurak Gregor, Kovač Marjeta, Morrison Shawnda A., Starc Gregor. (2020). Children's Physical Activity, Academic Performance, and Cognitive Functioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00307

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Conclusion drawn from the random-effects meta-analysis of 44 interventions. The article states "PA itself does not negatively affect AP" and that intensity of PA must also be considered, since most studies did not report intensity.

"The present analysis shows that PA itself does not negatively affect AP; moreover, there are positive, (although relatively small) relationships between the two, and that changes in AP itself is not caused solely by an increase in frequency and/or duration of PA"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.