Claims

School physical activity interventions did not significantly improve language, reading, or composite academic scores compared with controls

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Sub-group meta-analyses found the interventions were not capable of significantly improving academic achievement in language, reading, and composite scores. → Loturco 2022

Evidence

Loturco 2022

Loturco, I.; Montoya, N.P.; Ferraz, M.B.; Berbat, V.; Pereira, L.A. (2022). A Systematic Review of the Effects of Physical Activity on Specific Academic Skills of School Students. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020134

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effect meta-analysis of 31 included studies, split into subgroups of 4 language-test, 10 reading-assessment, and 9 composite-score studies. The review reports the interventions "were not capable of significantly improving academic achievement in language, reading, and composite scores." No effect size values are printed for these null results.

"The sub-group analyses revealed that the interventions were not capable of significantly improving academic achievement in language, reading, and composite scores."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.