Claims

A 5-week phonological awareness training program significantly improves word recognition ability in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder compared to no training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Experimental group post-test word recognition scores were significantly higher than control group scores (F = 285.166, p = 0.01; t = 16.75, p = 0.01). → Mohammed 2012 q3 i? T-test on post-test means favored the experimental group (t = 16.75, p = 0.01). → Mohammed 2012 (2)

Evidence

Mohammed 2012

Mohammed, A. A., & Mostafa, A. A. (2012). Effectiveness of a Phonological Awareness Training Intervention on Word recognition ability of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 1(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579061

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA analysis of post-test differences between experimental (n=24) and control (n=23) groups in Word Recognition Ability test scores showed a significant group effect, with "the (F) value was (285.166)" at the 0.01 level.

"The table shows that the (F) value was (285.166) and it was significant value at the level (0.01)."

Mohammed 2012 (2)

Mohammed, A. A., & Mostafa, A. A. (2012). Effectiveness of a Phonological Awareness Training Intervention on Word recognition ability of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 1(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579061

q3 · i? · causal · r2

T-test on post-test means (experimental M=16.583, SD=2.44; control M=6.826, SD=1.37) showed "significant at the level (0.01) in the favor of experimental group."

"The table shows that (t) vale was (16.75). This value is significant at the level (0.01) in the favor of experimental group."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.