Writers revising in Page mode backtrack more than Scroll writers, with no difference in total revising time¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 1997 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Page writers produced more backtracking sequences than Scroll writers (7.85 vs. 4.07, p < 0.02). → Annie Piolat 1997
q3 i? Total revising time did not differ significantly between Page and Scroll. → Annie Piolat 1997 (2)
Evidence¶
Annie Piolat 1997¶
Annie Piolat, Jean-Yves Roussey and Olivier Thunin. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1997.0145
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Experiment 2 revising task with 26 randomly assigned undergraduates using a minimal word processor; navigation-file counts showed Page writers moved around the text more, F(1, 24) = 6.25, p < 0.02.
"In line with Prediction 1, writers using Page did more backtracking than those using Scroll (7.85 vs. 4.07; F(1, 24) = 6.25, p < 0.02)."
Annie Piolat 1997 (2)¶
Annie Piolat, Jean-Yves Roussey and Olivier Thunin. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1997.0145
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Experiment 2 revising-time measure: Page 1496 s vs. Scroll 1731 s, F(1, 24) = 1.13, reported as not significantly different.
"The mean time taken by writers to modify the text with Page and Scroll did not differ significantly (Page = 1496 sec.; Scroll = 1731 s; F(1, 24) = 1.13)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Reading time did not differ between Page and Scroll, though Page readers tended to backtrack more
- Page writers corrected significantly more coherence errors than Scroll writers, while surface and cohesion corrections did not differ — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
page-revising-more-backtracking |
title |
Writers revising in Page mode backtrack more than Scroll writers, with no difference in total revising time |
description |
Writers revising in Page mode backtrack more than Scroll writers, with no difference in total revising time |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1997 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — annie-piolat-1997, annie-piolat-1997-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.