Claims

Paired Reading showed no evidence of an effect on reading outcomes for FSM pupils

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The trial found no evidence of an effect on overall reading ability, sentence completion and passage comprehension for pupils eligible for free school meals. → Lloyd et al. 2015

Evidence

Lloyd et al. 2015

Cheryl Lloyd, Triin Edovald, Zsolt Kiss, Stephen Morris, Amy Skipp and Hashim Ahmed (NatCen Social Research). (2015). Paired Reading Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581127

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Pre-specified separate regression models were estimated for pupils qualified for FSM, and an interaction test was implemented to confirm the findings. The report states there was "no evidence of the Paired Reading programme having an effect" on the FSM subgroup outcomes.

"There was no evidence of the Paired Reading programme having an effect on overall reading ability, sentence completion and passage comprehension of FSM pupils."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.