Claims

The Paired Reading programme showed no evidence of impact on Year 7 and Year 9 pupils' overall reading ability in a cluster RCT

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A cluster randomised controlled trial found no evidence that Paired Reading improved overall reading ability of participating pupils. → Lloyd et al. 2015

Evidence

Lloyd et al. 2015

Cheryl Lloyd, Triin Edovald, Zsolt Kiss, Stephen Morris, Amy Skipp and Hashim Ahmed (NatCen Social Research). (2015). Paired Reading Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581127

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Cluster randomised controlled trial of 2,736 pupils in 120 classes in ten secondary schools, with 58 classes allocated to intervention and 62 to control. The primary outcome was the NGRT Overall Reading Scale; the report concludes there was "no evidence from this evaluation" of any positive impact.

"There is no evidence from this evaluation that the Paired Reading programme had any positive impact on overall reading ability of participating pupils, measured using the New Group Reading Test (NGRT) scores"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.