The Paired Reading programme showed no evidence of impact on Year 7 and Year 9 pupils' overall reading ability in a cluster RCT¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A cluster randomised controlled trial found no evidence that Paired Reading improved overall reading ability of participating pupils. → Lloyd et al. 2015
Evidence¶
Lloyd et al. 2015¶
Cheryl Lloyd, Triin Edovald, Zsolt Kiss, Stephen Morris, Amy Skipp and Hashim Ahmed (NatCen Social Research). (2015). Paired Reading Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581127
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Cluster randomised controlled trial of 2,736 pupils in 120 classes in ten secondary schools, with 58 classes allocated to intervention and 62 to control. The primary outcome was the NGRT Overall Reading Scale; the report concludes there was "no evidence from this evaluation" of any positive impact.
"There is no evidence from this evaluation that the Paired Reading programme had any positive impact on overall reading ability of participating pupils, measured using the New Group Reading Test (NGRT) scores"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Reading and Language — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Rhythm for Reading had no statistically significant effect on overall reading ability in a pupil-randomised waitlist RCT with Year 7 pupils below Level 4 in English — related
- The Vocabulary Enrichment Full Programme showed no statistically significant impact on Year 7 pupils' reading ability in a pupil-randomised controlled trial — related
- The LIT programme showed no statistically significant impact on reading ability at the Year 7 year-group level — related
- The Literacy and Morphemes programme had no significant impact on Year 2 pupils' literacy ability overall — related
- RLC showed no evidence of impact on KS2 reading outcomes in a two-year randomised controlled trial — related
- Nine light-touch dissemination interventions had no impact on pupils' Key Stage 2 English attainment in a large school-level RCT — related
- Prior randomised trials of book-gifting programmes have shown little evidence of effects on children's reading skills — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.