Claims

The paired t-test on the two groups' achievement scores showed a statistically significant difference favouring the experimental group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The paired-samples t-test comparing controlled and experimental groups was significant (p=.000), so the null hypothesis of no difference was rejected. → Intakhab Alam Khan 2016

Evidence

Intakhab Alam Khan 2016

Intakhab Alam Khan. (2016). Effectiveness of E-learning for the Teaching of English: A Study of Comparative Strategies. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.3p.125

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Statistical analysis of the paired sample (N=17 per group as printed in Table 1) comparing control and experimental achievement scores; the printed t was -6.424 with df 16, and the article states "there is a significant difference". No effect size is printed.

"(The value of p=.000 which means that there is a significant difference)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.