Paper-based reading comprehension scores also improved significantly after the Web-based strategy training¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Posttest scores on the paper-based reading comprehension test were significantly higher than pretest scores. → Elham Dehghanpour & Mahmood Hashemian 2015
Evidence¶
Elham Dehghanpour & Mahmood Hashemian 2015¶
Elham Dehghanpour & Mahmood Hashemian. (2015). Efficiency of Using a Web-Based Approach to Teach Reading Strategies to Iranian EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n10p30
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Paired-samples t test on a paper-based TOEFL-style test (three readings, five multiple-choice questions each, 50 min) administered before and after the Web-based program to the same 30 participants. No effect size is printed.
"we can conclude that the difference between the participants' pretest scores (M = 9.86, SD = 2.47) and their posttest scores ( M = 10.83, SD = 2.74) t (29) = -2.09 in the paper-based condition is significant."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Web-based reading strategy training improved Iranian EFL learners' hypertext reading comprehension from pretest to posttest — related
- Reading strategy training improved reading comprehension for non-English majors over a five-week experiment — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.