Claims

In math, the PARCC college-ready standard predicts higher college performance than the MCAS proficient standard, while in ELA the standards are similar

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Meeting the PARCC college-readiness standard in math predicts a higher level of college performance than meeting the MCAS proficiency standard; in English language arts the two standards are similar. → Ira Nichols-Barrer 2015

q2 i? In math, the PARCC college-ready standard predicts a higher level of college performance than the MCAS proficiency standard; in ELA the standards are similar. → Erin Dillon 2015

Evidence

Ira Nichols-Barrer 2015

Ira Nichols-Barrer, Kate Place, Erin Dillon, Brian Gill. (2015). Predictive Validity of MCAS and PARCC: Comparing 10th Grade MCAS Tests to PARCC Integrated Math II, Algebra II, and 10th Grade English Language Arts Tests. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/predictive-validity-of-mcas-and-parcc-comparing-10th-grade-mcas-tests-to-parcc-integrated-math-ii

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The comparative study compared students meeting the PARCC college-ready standard against those meeting the MCAS proficient standard, finding the PARCC standard "predicts a higher level of college performance" in math only. No effect size is printed.

"In math, meeting the PARCC standard for college readiness predicts a higher level of college performance than meeting the MCAS standard for proficiency, while in English language arts the two standards are similar."

Erin Dillon 2015

Erin Dillon, Ira Nichols-Barrer, Brian Gill, Kate Place. (2015). Policy Brief: Calibrating Performance Standards Across State Lines: How PARCC Predicts College Readiness. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/policy-brief-calibrating-performance-standards-across-state-lines-how-parcc-predicts-college

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Key findings comparison of performance standards across subjects: the brief reports that in math the PARCC college-readiness standard "predicts a higher level of college performance than meeting the MCAS standard for proficiency," with no printed effect size.

"In math, meeting the PARCC standard for college readiness predicts a higher level of college performance than meeting the MCAS standard for proficiency, while in English language arts the two standards are similar."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id parcc-college-ready-standard-higher-math-college-performance
aliases parcc-math-standard-higher-college-performance-than-mcas
title In math, the PARCC college-ready standard predicts higher college performance than the MCAS proficient standard, while in ELA the standards are similar
description In math, the PARCC college-ready standard predicts higher college performance than the MCAS proficient standard, while in ELA the standards are similar
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
recheck_by 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — ira-nichols-barrer-2015, erin-dillon-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.