The treatment group also significantly outperformed a matched control group created to control for parental education¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 After adjusting for pretest scores, the experimental group significantly outperformed the matched control group on the GMADE Total Test with a large effect size (partial eta-squared = .12). → Lore 2016

Evidence¶

Lore 2016¶

Lore, M. D., Wang, A. H., & Buckley, M. (2016). Effectiveness of a Parent-Child Home Numeracy Intervention on Urban Catholic School First Grade Students. Journal of Catholic Education, 19(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.15365/joce.1903082016

q3 · i2 · causal · r1

Second ANCOVA comparing the treatment group (n = 12) with a matched control group (n = 21) created to control for parental education differences. Posttest Total means were 45.67 (treatment) vs 33.05 (matched control). The article reports "a large effect size (partial eta-squared = .12)".

"Results also indicated a statistical significant difference between the experimental group and the matched control group on the GMADE Total Test score (F(1, 30) = 4.26, p < .05) with a large effect size (partial eta-squared = .12)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• First-grade students whose parents received numeracy training and delivered a home numeracy intervention made significantly larger GMADE Total Test gains than the control group — related