Claims

The parental engagement offer alone showed no statistically significant effect on attainment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 The estimated effect of eligibility for the parental engagement offer alone was -0.252 (95% CI -0.576 to 0.071) across 186 pupils and not statistically significant. → Dorsett 2014

Evidence

Dorsett 2014

Dorsett, R., Rienzo, C., Rolfe, H., Burns, H., Robertson, B.-A., Thorpe, B., & Wall, K. (2014). Mind the Gap: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581160

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Component analysis of the randomised controlled trial comparing PETT classes to TT classes to isolate the impact of parental engagement eligibility. The summary table row prints an effect size of -0.252 with confidence interval -0.576 to 0.071 for 186 pupils, estimated -3 months' progress, flagged "No" for statistical significance.

"Parental engagement offer alone 186 -0.252 (-0.576, 0.071) -3 No"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.