Parents' job type does not significantly affect students' creative thinking¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? ANOVA found no meaningful differences between parents' job type and students' creative thinking (p = 0.219). → Robabeh Puran 2017

Evidence¶

Robabeh Puran 2017¶

Robabeh Puran, Mohamad Hasan Behzadi, Ahmad Shahvarani, Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi. (2017). The Effects of Training and Other Factors on Problem Solving in Students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(3): 448-460. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.3.448

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANOVA (Hypothesis 3) on the 450-student sample: between-groups p = 0.219, non-significant. The article notes most parents were self-employed and suggests they elaborate less on the creativity of their own jobs. Equivalence was not tested.

"The results of table 6 show that the p-value (0.219) was more than 0.05, so the mean of parents' job and students' creati ve thinking are the same and there weren’t any meaningful differences between parents' job and the students' creative thinking."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Creativity — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Parents' education level affects students' creative thinking, with BA and MA parents' children scoring higher — related
• Gender does not significantly affect students' creative thinking in problem solving — related