Claims

Partially online courses were rated as more satisfactory than exclusively online courses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review reports, citing Cole et al. (2014), that partially online courses were rated as more satisfactory than exclusively online courses. → Rodrigues 2019

Evidence

Rodrigues 2019

Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V. & Lopes, S. L. (2019). Tracking e-learning through published papers: a systematic review. Computers and Education. 136, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review attributes this second-hand finding to Cole et al. (2014)'s three-year study of student satisfaction with online instruction. No effect size or test statistic is printed in the review.

"It is also relevant to point out that authors found that partially online courses were rated as more satisfactory than exclusively online courses."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.