Passive backdoor defense (SBD) effectiveness is distillation-dependent, degrading under persona-centric abstraction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Semantic-level Backdoor Injection achieves high detection rates under Direct and three-stage Distill but drops sharply under Colleague Distill. → Yongli Xiang 2026
Evidence¶
Yongli Xiang 2026¶
Yongli Xiang, Zhifang Zhang, Bojun Yang, Ziming Hong, Lei Feng, Miao Xu, Tongliang Liu. (2026). When Agents Learn to Be You: Benchmarking Privacy Leakage, Impersonation Risk, and Defenses in Persona Skills. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03700 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.03700
q2 · i? · design · r2
Passive defense evaluation on GPT 5.4 in Table 2, measuring static (ASR-S) and behavioral (ASR-B) attack success rates. Under three-stage Distill, "online/post-hoc injection reaches 98.0/98.0 ASR-S and 82.6/52.4 ASR-B"; under Direct Distill, "100.0/96.0 ASR-S and 46.1/40.4 ASR-B". Descriptive percentages; no effect sizes printed.
"Incontrast,underCol- leagueDistill,theonlinebackdoorreachesonly40.0ASR-S and 0.0 ASR-B, with post-hoc backdoor following the same pattern (30.0 ASR-S, 0.0 ASR-B)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Persona-skill distillation encodes substantial private information into skill artifacts, persisting across agent backbones and distillation protocols — related
- Active defenses (Privacy Sanitization, Adversarial Obfuscation) reduce but do not eliminate persona-skill leakage, leaving personality and background exposed — related
- Skill-equipped agents reproduce target users' attributes and language, enabling impersonation across unseen contexts — related
- Skill-level leakage is strongest for communication style and personality, not explicit demographics — related
- Consistency degrades under multi-strategy evaluation for all personas, driven mainly by tone instability rather than logical contradiction — related
- Multi-strategy adversarial evaluation lowers RPLA robustness scores by 0.174–0.203 points relative to a single-strategy baseline across three personas — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
passive-sbd-defense-distillation-dependent |
title |
Passive backdoor defense (SBD) effectiveness is distillation-dependent, degrading under persona-centric abstraction |
description |
Passive backdoor defense (SBD) effectiveness is distillation-dependent, degrading under persona-centric abstraction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yongli-xiang-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.