Claims

Passport to Literacy produced a small positive but nonsignificant effect on GMRT reading comprehension (g = 0.28) relative to business-as-usual comparison

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 In a partially nested RCT, the treatment group outperformed comparison on GMRT reading comprehension with g = 0.28, but the effect was nonsignificant after Benjamini-Hochberg correction. → Wanzek et al. 2016

Evidence

Wanzek et al. 2016

Jeanne Wanzek, Yaacov Petscher, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Shawn C. Kent, Christopher Schatschneider, Martha Haynes, Brenna K. Rivas, Francesca G. Jones. (2016). Examining the Average and Local Effects of a Standardized Treatment for Fourth Graders with Reading Difficulties. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED577133

q3 · i1 · causal · r3

Partially nested randomized controlled trial with 221 fourth graders assigned within school to treatment (n = 111) or comparison (n = 110); mixed models controlled pretest and accounted for clustering. The GMRT result was "a significant, positive effect (g = 0.28)" that became nonsignificant after correction for seven tests.

"The individual mixed model for the GMRT reading comprehension outcome resulted in a significant, positive effect (g = 0.28); however, the application of the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for the seven tests of treatment effects yielded a non-significant p-value."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.