Claims

Teachers reported insufficient time to deliver PATHS at the recommended frequency, with on average only half of lessons delivered

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Observed classes were an average of 20 lessons behind schedule, equivalent to 10 weeks at 2 lessons per week. → Alexandra Barlow 2015

Evidence

Alexandra Barlow 2015

Alexandra Barlow, Michael Wigelsworth, Ann Lendrum, Kirsty Pert, Craig Joyce, Emma Stephens, Lawrence Wo, Garry Squires, Kevin Woods, Rachel Calam, Mark Harrison, Alex Turner, and Neil Humphrey. (2015). Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS) Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581278

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Structured lesson observations in intervention schools assessed dosage relative to the planned delivery schedule. Teachers reported a lack of time to implement PATHS at the recommended twice-weekly frequency, so on average only half the lessons were delivered.

"However, mean dosage scores indicated that classes were an average of 20 lessons behind schedule (the equivalent of 10 weeks at 2 lessons per week) at the point of observation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.