The article reports that PBL raised the average creative thinking ability of its participants above the control class¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The authors state that the average creative thinking ability of students using the PBL model was bigger than the control class, attributing PBL's effect to an open-ended approach. → Maskur 2020
Evidence¶
Maskur 2020¶
Maskur, R., Sumarno, S., Rahmawati, Y., Pradana, K., Syazali, M., Septian, A., & Kinarya Palupi, E. (2020). The effectiveness of problem based learning and aptitude treatment interaction in improving mathematical creative thinking skills on Curriculum 2013. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 375-383. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.375
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' interpretive statement in the Discussion about the PBL condition of their quasi-experiment, asserting the PBL group's average exceeded the control class. No statistic, test, or effect size is printed for this contrast, and no control-class data appear elsewhere in the results.
"PBL models can affect the ability of mathematical creative thinking by using an open-ended approach. Based on the average creative thinking ability of participant students who use the PBL model is bigger than the control class."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Creativity — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- The Aptitude Treatment Interaction model has a significant effect on students' mathematical creative thinking abilities compared to the Problem Based Learning model — related
- Descriptive scores for mathematical creative thinking ability were higher in the ATI class (mean 87.07) than in the PBL class (mean 77.18) — related
- Relative to traditional PBL, the AI-IVE-PBL model improves vocational students' design ability and creative ability — related
- GenAI-assisted education produces significantly higher higher-order thinking abilities than non-GenAI approaches (g = 0.72) — a broader claim this one bears on
- PBL improves EFL students' critical thinking disposition, creativity, and language scores, with noted gender differences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.