Claims

Student engagement is higher during PBL than during traditional instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Engagement is found to be higher during PBL than traditional instruction among the same students, and in PBL classes compared to traditional classes. → Belland Brian R. 2013

Evidence

Belland Brian R. 2013

Belland Brian R., Kim ChanMin, Hannafin Michael J. (2013). A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

The review attributes this to Rotgans and Schmidt (2011a) and Ahlfeldt, Mehta, and Sellnow (2005); neither study was read here. It supports the claim that authentic problems in PBL may capture interest and perceived value.

"Engagement is often found to be higher (a) during PBL than during traditional instruction among the same students (Rotgans & Schmidt, 2011a), and (b) in classes that use PBL than in traditional classes (Ahlfeldt, Mehta, & Sellnow, 2005)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pbl-engagement-higher-than-traditional
title Student engagement is higher during PBL than during traditional instruction
description Student engagement is higher during PBL than during traditional instruction
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — belland-brian-r-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.