Claims

Seventh-grade students taught statistics through project-based learning achieved higher learning outcomes than students taught with conventional learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ANCOVA showed a statistically significant difference in learning outcomes favoring the PBL experimental class over the conventional control class (F = 103.4339, p = 0.000). → Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO 2018

Evidence

Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO 2018

Tatag Yuli Eko SISWONO, Sugi HARTONO, Ahmad Wachidul KOHAR. (2018). Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Statistics for Lower Secondary Schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 75, 197-212. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181463

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group study over two months with 37 experimental and 38 control seventh-grade students; pretest-posttest data analyzed by ANCOVA. The article reports "F = 103.4339 against p = 0.000" with p < 0.05. No effect size is printed.

"Based on analysis of inferential statistical data, the results of the analysis showed ANCOVA test F = 103.4339 against p = 0.000 . Because p <0.05, there is a significant difference between project-based learning in the experimental class and conventional learning in the control class."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.