Claims

PBL is associated with higher theoretical examination scores than traditional lecture-based teaching in Chinese pharmacy education (SMD = 1.17)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Pooled analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials shows PBL groups scored significantly higher on theoretical examinations than lecture-based control groups (SMD = 1.17, 95% CI [0.77, 1.57], P < 0.00001). → Zhou Jiyin 2016

Evidence

Zhou Jiyin 2016

Zhou Jiyin, Zhou Shiwen, Huang Chunji, Xu Rufu, Zhang Zuo, Zeng Shengya, Qian Guisheng. (2016). Effectiveness of problem-based learning in Chinese pharmacy education: a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0546-z

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials (17 outcome reports) in Chinese pharmacy education, pooled with a random-effects model in RevMan 5.3. The pooled effect "showed a significant difference in theoretical scores" favoring PBL over traditional lectures, with SMD = 1.17 and 95% CI [0.77, 1.57].

"The pooled effect size showed a significant difference in theoretical scores (SMD = 1.17, 95 % CI [0.77, 1.57], P < 0.00001) in favor of PBL, compared with traditional lectures (Fig. 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.